Desk 02 · Sort it yourself

Interactive World Cup Tables

Every number on this page is yours to reorder. Sort by any column, filter by nation, and compare the contenders for 2026 on the metrics that actually matter — not just on reputation.

A league table is the simplest visualisation in football, yet it hides a lot. Our interactive tables let you pull the same dataset apart from different angles — defensive record, attacking output, or pure points-per-game form across the latest qualifying windows.

Pre-tournament

Contender power ranking

A composite ranking weighing recent results, squad depth and underlying numbers for the leading 2026 candidates. Use the search box to jump to a single nation.

#NationConfederationRatingForm (W-D-L)Title odds
1FranceUEFA92.48-1-1
2ArgentinaCONMEBOL91.17-2-1
3SpainUEFA89.78-2-0
4BrazilCONMEBOL88.37-1-2
5EnglandUEFA87.07-2-1
6PortugalUEFA85.66-3-1
7NetherlandsUEFA84.26-2-2
8CroatiaUEFA80.95-3-2
9GermanyUEFA79.55-2-3
10AustraliaAFC71.36-2-2

Click any header to sort · type in the box to filter.

Road to 2026

Qualifying form table

Points-per-game tells you who is travelling well into the tournament. Several smaller nations punch above their seeding here — a reminder that the expanded 48-team field rewards consistency as much as star power.

NationPlayedWonGFGAPts/Game
Spain1082562.60
France1082372.50
Norway1072192.30
Switzerland1071882.20
Austria10617102.00
Türkiye10616111.90
Czechia10514121.70
Belgium10513131.60
Model output

Sample group projection

An illustration of how our model projects a single first-round group, blending ratings and schedule. With 48 teams split across 12 groups, the third-placed sides become a story in themselves — and a fertile source of data.

TeamProj. PtsAdvance %Win group %
Netherlands6.88854
Senegal4.96123
Canada4.14815
New Zealand2.4198

These projections pair naturally with chance-quality data. To see how the underlying performances stack up, head to the xG Lab.